Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Race results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,079 hits . Analysis detected 7,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (22,053 of 59,653 keywords). This Presidential Race is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Presidential Race
Keyword details
Total words: 5,252
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst