Keyword summary
91%2 analyzed articles/videos1,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Infrastructure results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 945 hits. Analysis detected 6,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 73% (16,535 of 59,653 keywords). This Power Infrastructure is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Power Infrastructure
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
73%Power Infrastructure (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,008
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate