Keyword summary
87% 7 analyzed articles/videos 13,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pop And Rock results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 6,578 hits . Analysis detected 58,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,887 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (38,791 of 53,271 keywords). This Pop And Rock is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Pop And Rock
Keyword details
Total words: 63,887
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles63.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst