Keyword summary
56%3 analyzed articles/videos4,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Science results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,061 hits. Analysis detected 8,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,171 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (51,905 of 59,653 keywords). This Political Science is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Political Science
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
13%Political Science (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,171
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos