Keyword summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pittsburgh Penguins results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 46% (29,276 of 53,522 keywords). This Pittsburgh Penguins is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Pittsburgh Penguins
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 71% 7/12/2026, 10:36:57 AM