Keyword summary
87% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Zumthor results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,636 hits . Analysis detected 18,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,864 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (36,913 of 59,653 keywords). This Peter Zumthor is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Peter Zumthor
Keyword details
Total words: 20,864
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst