Keyword summary
84% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Thiel results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 3,667 hits . Analysis detected 35,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,660 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (33,296 of 59,653 keywords). This Peter Thiel is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Peter Thiel
Keyword details
Total words: 31,660
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles31.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst