Keyword summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pension Fund results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 715 hits . Analysis detected 5,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 75% (15,064 of 59,735 keywords). This Pension Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Pension Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 4,960
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst