Keyword summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Pascal results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 2,747 hits . Analysis detected 16,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,016 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (42,950 of 57,696 keywords). This Pedro Pascal is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Pedro Pascal
Keyword details
Total words: 24,016
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles24K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst