Keyword summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paradoxical Lucidity results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Optimism Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 700 hits . Analysis detected 3,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (40,864 of 59,653 keywords). This Paradoxical Lucidity is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Paradoxical Lucidity
Keyword details
Total words: 8,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst