Keyword summary
58% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 844 hits . Analysis detected 7,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,094 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (50,088 of 59,653 keywords). This Ohio Politics is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Ohio Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 13,094
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst