Keyword summary
71%6 analyzed articles/videos4,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nominating Convention results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 1,085 hits. Analysis detected 12,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,064 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (44,330 of 59,726 keywords). This Nominating Convention is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Nominating Convention
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
26%Nominating Convention (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,064
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate