Keyword summary
59%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No Country For Mothers results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 2,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (21,240 of 52,461 keywords). This No Country For Mothers is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
No Country For Mothers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
60%No Country For Mothers (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos