Keyword summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Mayor results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 3,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,182 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 40% (34,250 of 57,068 keywords). This New York Mayor is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. New York Mayor
Keyword details
Total words: 4,182
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst