Keyword summary
87%2 analyzed articles/videos2,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mullin V Doe results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,405 hits. Analysis detected 6,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,500 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (25,359 of 59,751 keywords). This Mullin V Doe is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Mullin V Doe
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
58%Mullin V Doe (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,500
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 18.7%18.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos