Keyword summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Motor City results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 883 hits . Analysis detected 4,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (28,227 of 59,653 keywords). This Motor City is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Motor City
Keyword details
Total words: 5,896
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst