Keyword summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Millionaires results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 669 hits . Analysis detected 5,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (26,496 of 58,495 keywords). This Millionaires is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Millionaires
Keyword details
Total words: 6,008
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst