Keyword summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milan results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 3,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (26,339 of 59,653 keywords). This Milan is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Milan
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
56%Milan (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,068
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos