Keyword summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midnight & The Wicked results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 397 hits . Analysis detected 3,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (43,008 of 57,524 keywords). This Midnight & The Wicked is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Midnight & The Wicked
Keyword details
Total words: 7,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst