Keyword summary
41%1 analyzed article/video660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microchips results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 54% (24,867 of 53,883 keywords). This Microchips is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Microchips
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
54%Microchips (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos