Keyword summary
85% 37 analyzed articles/videos 19,961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miami results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 7,742 hits . Analysis detected 75,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,297 analyzed words across 37 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (39,667 of 54,090 keywords). This Miami is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Miami
Keyword details
Total words: 84,297
Article count: 37
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score37 analyzed articles84.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst