Keyword summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mckendrick's Steak House results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (34,389 of 59,610 keywords). This Mckendrick's Steak House is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Mckendrick's Steak House
Keyword details
Total words: 2,900
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst