Keyword summary
73% 19 analyzed articles/videos 9,910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Rutte results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 5,773 hits . Analysis detected 39,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,335 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (46,037 of 58,342 keywords). This Mark Rutte is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Mark Rutte
Keyword details
Total words: 49,335
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score19 analyzed articles49.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst