Keyword summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 1,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Shriver results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,106 hits . Analysis detected 8,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 65% (19,111 of 53,839 keywords). This Maria Shriver is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Maria Shriver
Keyword details
Total words: 7,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst