Author summary
88% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Kerr results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 3,141 hits . Analysis detected 22,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,975 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,639 of 9,329 authors). This Andrew Kerr is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Andrew Kerr
Author details
Total words: 19,975
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst