Keyword summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Watches results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 461 hits . Analysis detected 3,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,608 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (45,105 of 59,653 keywords). This Luxury Watches is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Luxury Watches
Keyword details
Total words: 5,608
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst