Keyword summary
32%2 analyzed articles/videos2,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lincoln County results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 3,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,150 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (55,760 of 59,759 keywords). This Lincoln County is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Lincoln County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
7%Lincoln County (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,150
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.7% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos