Keyword summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Smith results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 973 hits . Analysis detected 8,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (8,464 of 59,653 keywords). This Lee Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Lee Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 4,064
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.8% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst