Keyword summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kane Parsons results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 3,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,552 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (38,437 of 56,136 keywords). This Kane Parsons is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Kane Parsons
Keyword details
Total words: 4,552
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst