Keyword summary
45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Watch results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 3,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (39,669 of 55,093 keywords). This Judicial Watch is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Judicial Watch
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
28%Judicial Watch (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,332
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate