Keyword summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jens Spahn results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 6,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,816 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (48,261 of 59,653 keywords). This Jens Spahn is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Jens Spahn
Keyword details
Total words: 9,816
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst