Keyword summary
56%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iraq Oil Production Recovery results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 447 hits. Analysis detected 1,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (36,611 of 59,653 keywords). This Iraq Oil Production Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Iraq Oil Production Recovery
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
39%Iraq Oil Production Recovery (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos