Author summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos2,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Silverstein results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,218 hits. Analysis detected 7,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,197 of 9,211 authors). This Ken Silverstein is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Ken Silverstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
44%Ken Silverstein (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,196
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos