Keyword summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interceptors results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 2,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 54% (24,611 of 53,020 keywords). This Interceptors is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Interceptors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
54%Interceptors (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,484
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos