Keyword summary
84% 9 analyzed articles/videos 10,932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inspector General results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 4,059 hits . Analysis detected 32,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,760 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (43,274 of 59,653 keywords). This Inspector General is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Inspector General
Keyword details
Total words: 41,760
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles41.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst