Keyword summary
89% 34 analyzed articles/videos 34,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ice) results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 16,428 hits . Analysis detected 138,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 144,961 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (39,968 of 56,030 keywords). This Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ice) is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ice)
Keyword details
Total words: 144,961
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score34 analyzed articles145K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst