Keyword summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Institute Of Technology results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (22,566 of 54,192 keywords). This Illinois Institute Of Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Illinois Institute Of Technology
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,270
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos