Author summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Kurian Philip results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 343 hits . Analysis detected 2,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,182 of 8,559 authors). This Lisa Kurian Philip is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Lisa Kurian Philip
Author details
Total words: 3,270
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst