Keyword summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humane Justice results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 407 hits . Analysis detected 3,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (32,586 of 59,653 keywords). This Humane Justice is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Humane Justice
Keyword details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst