Keyword summary
31% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Context results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 3,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,598 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (52,666 of 59,653 keywords). This Historical Context is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Historical Context
Keyword details
Total words: 8,598
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst