Keyword summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Happy Sad Confused Podcast results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 3,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (15,940 of 52,640 keywords). This Happy Sad Confused Podcast is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Happy Sad Confused Podcast
Keyword details
Total words: 3,508
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst