Keyword summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gut And Amend results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 242 hits . Analysis detected 2,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (48,009 of 58,197 keywords). This Gut And Amend is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Gut And Amend
Keyword details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst