Keyword summary
22%2 analyzed articles/videos1,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gulf Of Oman results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 2,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (37,054 of 59,653 keywords). This Gulf Of Oman is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Gulf Of Oman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
38%Gulf Of Oman (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,320
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos