Author summary
85% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Copp results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,101 hits . Analysis detected 6,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,892 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,742 of 8,763 authors). This Tara Copp is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Tara Copp
Author details
Total words: 5,892
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst