Keyword summary
56% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gubernatorial Election results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 579 hits . Analysis detected 4,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,460 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (42,385 of 59,653 keywords). This Gubernatorial Election is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Gubernatorial Election
Keyword details
Total words: 7,460
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst