Keyword summary
92%1 analyzed article/video2,925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grooming Allegations results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 3,865 hits. Analysis detected 17,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (15,935 of 58,292 keywords). This Grooming Allegations is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Grooming Allegations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
73%Grooming Allegations (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 33.0%33.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos