Keyword summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater Seattle results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 1,849 hits . Analysis detected 7,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,474 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (11,859 of 59,653 keywords). This Greater Seattle is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Greater Seattle
Keyword details
Total words: 5,474
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 33.8% 33.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst