Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 782 analyzed words
No results found.
BS Summary: These Josh Feit results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 1,092 hits . Analysis detected 4,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,128 analyzed words across 1 article or video, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,200 of 8,706 authors). This Josh Feit is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Josh Feit
Author details
Total words: 3,128
Content count: 1
Publications
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.2% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.9% 34.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.0%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos