Keyword summary
74% 25 analyzed articles/videos 27,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Washington results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 9,303 hits . Analysis detected 96,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 111,871 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (43,230 of 57,453 keywords). This George Washington is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. George Washington
Keyword details
Total words: 111,871
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score25 analyzed articles111.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst