Keyword summary
14% 1 analyzed article/video 775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fredericksburg Road results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 207 hits . Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (45,672 of 59,653 keywords). This Fredericksburg Road is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Fredericksburg Road
Keyword details
Total words: 3,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst